Can anyone actually hear the difference in a Stradivarius?
Star violinists wearing welders' goggles couldn't tell a 300-year-old Stradivarius from a brand-new violin, and most preferred a new one.
▶ Start the storyMostly, no. In blind tests from 1817 to 2014, listeners have never reliably told a Stradivarius from a high-quality violin by another maker, and acoustic analysis hasn't found the difference either. A Stradivarius is a masterpiece of craftsmanship and history, worth millions, but its magic seems to live at least partly in our expectations.
The tests are delightfully humbling. In 1977 the BBC asked the great violinists Isaac Stern and Pinchas Zukerman, plus a leading violin dealer, to identify four instruments played behind a screen: a Stradivarius, a Guarneri, a 19th-century French violin and one made the year before in Britain. None of them got more than two right, and two picked the brand-new violin as the Stradivarius. In 2009 a modern violin made from fungus-treated wood won 90 of 180 audience votes, far ahead of a 1711 Stradivarius, and most listeners thought the winner was the Strad.
The most careful study, published in 2014, had ten star soloists play old Italian and new violins while wearing welders' goggles in dim light. Their favorite was a new violin, and they couldn't tell old from new better than chance. Some violinists object that such tests are too short or not expert enough, and the debate goes on.
Chance level
Quiz me
0/3
Recap
When players and listeners can't see the instrument, the Stradivarius advantage mostly disappears.
Surprising fact · In a 2014 study, star soloists wearing welders' goggles preferred a new violin and couldn't tell old from new better than chance.
Sources (2)
No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (16 claims) cites at least one of these.