History●●●●●Difficulty 5 of 5

How many people died in the Americas after 1492, and was it mostly disease?

Estimates of the starting population differ by a factor of ten, and scholars still disagree about what killed so many.

▶ Start the story

Nobody knows exactly, because nobody knows how many people lived there at the start. Estimates of the pre-colonial Indigenous population range from as low as 8 million to as many as 100 million, though by the end of the 20th century many scholars tended toward about 50 million. These estimates are extrapolations from small bits of data. One much-cited statement from scientists at University College London is that some 90% of Indigenous Americans had perished a century after Columbus, from disease, mass slavery and war.

8 to 100 million

Range of estimates for the Indigenous population before colonization

What killed them is also argued. The causes include Eurasian diseases such as influenza, pneumonic plagues and smallpox; direct violence through war and forced removal; and the general disruption of societies. Scholarly disputes remain over the degree to which each contributed. Some scholars, like Noble David Cook, believe epidemic disease, to which Indigenous peoples had no prior exposure or resistance, was the primary cause. In places such as Mexico in the 16th century, 50-80 percent of the population died from waves of disease brought by Europeans.

Others push back. Andrés Reséndez points out that deadly diseases such as smallpox are not mentioned in the New World until 1519, implying that until then disease played no significant part in the depopulation of the Antilles, where forced labour, brutal punishment and lack of the necessities of life were the initial and major reasons. More broadly, as the Coquille scholar Dina Gilio-Whitaker puts it, recent researchers challenge the idea that disease alone was responsible, pointing also to war, massacres, enslavement, overwork, deportation, malnutrition and the loss of land.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.What, according to the source, did low estimates such as Kroeber's 8.4 million often reflect?
  2. 2.What is Andrés Reséndez's point about the Antilles?
  3. 3.Why do figures like 'about 90% died' deserve caution?

Recap

The size of the loss and the weight of disease versus forced labour and violence are both contested, and every figure is an attributed estimate.

💡 A trick to remember it · Two unknowns, not one: how many were there, and what took them.

Surprising fact · Andrés Reséndez points out that deadly diseases such as smallpox are not mentioned in the New World until 1519.

Sources (2)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (16 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Population history of Indigenous peoples of the Americas · Wikipedia
  2. [2]Virgin soil epidemic · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🏛 History (3) See all history lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗