Tech●●●●●Difficulty 5 of 5

What can a quantum computer actually do that an ordinary one can't?

A large-scale quantum computer could, in principle, break widely used encryption and simulate physics classical machines never could. Building one that actually works at that scale is a different story.

▶ Start the story

A quantum computer could, in principle, solve a few specific problems exponentially faster than any ordinary computer. It does this with superposition, interference and entanglement instead of plain bits. A classical bit is always 0 or 1. A qubit can be a mix of both, and measuring it returns one answer by chance. That's why it doesn't simply 'try every answer at once': you only ever read out one result. The trick is to use interference to tilt the odds toward the answer you want.

The idea came from physicists. Simulating quantum systems on ordinary computers gets exponentially harder as they grow. In the early 1980s, Richard Feynman and Yuri Manin independently suggested building hardware out of quantum phenomena instead. In 1994 Peter Shor gave the field real teeth: a quantum algorithm that factors large numbers fast. No known classical algorithm can match it, and much of internet encryption relies on factoring being hard.

The catch is keeping qubits alive. A qubit not well isolated from its surroundings loses its quantum state. This is called decoherence, and it floods a calculation with errors. The fix, quantum error correction, spreads each qubit's information across many physical qubits. Because of that overhead, beating ordinary computers at factoring may take machines with millions of qubits.

A gold chandelier-shaped cryostat housing an IBM Q quantum computer, installed in Germany.
An IBM Q System One, installed in Germany: the hardware must keep qubits almost perfectly isolated to avoid decoherence.Photo: IBM Research · CC BY 2.0

Researchers have claimed quantum devices that beat classical computers at narrow, specially chosen tasks. Those tasks aren't yet useful ones. As of 2026, such results are best seen as scientific milestones, not proof that practical machines are close. Governments are betting anyway: their investment reached about ten billion dollars by April 2025.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.Why can't a quantum computer simply try every possible answer at once and hand you the right one?
  2. 2.What is the main practical obstacle preventing today's quantum computers from running an algorithm like Shor's at a useful scale?
  3. 3.What does a claimed 'quantum advantage' actually show about today's quantum computers?

Recap

The real obstacle to quantum computing isn't the algorithms, it's keeping fragile qubits from losing their quantum state to decoherence long enough to finish a calculation.

Surprising fact · Beating a classical computer at factoring with Shor's algorithm may require a quantum computer with millions of physical qubits, due to the overhead of error correction.

Sources (6)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (13 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Quantum computing · Wikipedia
  2. [2]Richard Feynman · Wikipedia
  3. [3]Shor's algorithm · Wikipedia
  4. [4]Quantum decoherence · Wikipedia
  5. [5]Quantum error correction · Wikipedia
  6. [6]Qubit · Wikipedia
More lessons in 💻 Tech (3) See all tech lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗