History●●●●●Difficulty 4 of 5

What did the wrecks and bones of the Franklin expedition show?

129 men vanished in the Arctic in 1845. Lead, zinc, cut marks and an Inuk hunter's memory are still sorting out why.

▶ Start the story

In 1845 Sir John Franklin sailed into the Arctic with two ships and 129 men. Whalers saw the ships in Baffin Bay that summer, and the expedition was never seen again by Europeans. Piecing together what happened has taken generations, and the evidence points to several causes whose weight is still argued.

The clearest message from the expedition itself is the Victory Point note. It says the crews had spent two winters off King William Island, that Franklin died on 11 June 1847, and that the survivors planned to set out for the Back River, with Franklin, eight more officers and 15 men already dead. In 1854 Inuit told John Rae that 35 to 40 white men had died of starvation near the Back River, with reports of cannibalism.

Then forensic scientists went to work. Owen Beattie's 1981 expedition found lead in a crewman's bones at about ten times the level in local Inuit skeletons, and the autopsy of John Torrington showed pneumonia as the cause of death with lead poisoning as a contributing factor. Bones excavated later carried cut marks consistent with de-fleshing, and it is now generally accepted that some of the men resorted to cannibalism, as the Inuit had said.

226 ppm

Lead in crewmen's bones in 1981, about ten times the level in local Inuit skeletons (26–36 ppm)

Both the source and the role of the lead are disputed. William Battersby argued that the ships' desalination system was a likelier source of lead than the tinned food; K. T. H. Farrer argued the tins could not have supplied enough. A 2013 study found the lead in the bones had been steady throughout the men's lives, with no spike near the end, and a 2016 study pointed instead to zinc deficiency and malnutrition. The ships were found too: Erebus in 2014, and Terror in 2016, after an Inuk hunter remembered seeing what looked like a mast in the ice.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.What did the autopsy of John Torrington find?
  2. 2.Why do some scholars doubt that lead from the tinned food killed the crews?
  3. 3.How did Inuit knowledge help find the wrecks?

Recap

The evidence points to several factors, among them ice, two winters on stored food, disease and possibly lead, and researchers still argue over their weight; Inuit testimony pointed the way.

💡 A trick to remember it · Ice, tins, bones and a hunter's memory: four clues, one old mystery.

Surprising fact · The lead story is disputed: a 2013 study found no late spike of lead in the bones.

Sources (2)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (16 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Franklin's lost expedition · Wikipedia
  2. [2]HMS Terror (1813) · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🏛 History (3) See all history lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗