Natureโ—โ—โ—โ—โ—Difficulty 3 of 5

Did Alex the parrot and Koko the gorilla really use language?

A parrot that asked for a banana and a gorilla that signed to her trainers. Scientists still argue about what it meant.

โ–ถ Start the story

Not in the full human sense, by most scientific accounts, though both animals clearly learned to communicate. Alex named objects, colours and quantities, and Koko used many signs adapted from American Sign Language. But the scientific consensus is that Koko did not show the or required for true language, and Alex's own trainer never claimed more than a two-way communications code.

Alex was a grey parrot and the subject of a thirty-year experiment by the animal psychologist Irene Pepperberg. His training used a : he watched two trainers interact, one modelling the desired behaviour and acting as a rival for the other trainer's attention. In 1999 Pepperberg reported that he could identify 50 objects, recognise quantities up to six, distinguish seven colours and five shapes, and understand 'bigger', 'smaller', 'same' and 'different'. Looking at a mirror, he said "What color?" and learned the word "grey" after being told it six times. In research testing he gave the correct answer about 80 percent of the time.

about 80%

of Alex's answers were correct in research testing

Koko, a gorilla, used many signs adapted from American Sign Language and understood nouns, verbs and adjectives. Some experts said she used language in the same way as people. Others, notably Herbert Terrace and Laura-Ann Petitto, suggested she was simply being prompted by her trainers' to display specific signs.

Critics acknowledged that Koko learned a number of signs and used them to communicate her wants, but that did not mean she spoke sign language, which requires and grammatical sentences. Terrace, for his part, thinks Alex performed by .

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.What is the main reason most scientists doubt that Koko used true language?
  2. 2.Why did Terrace and Petitto link Koko's signing to the Clever Hans problem?
  3. 3.How did Pepperberg herself describe Alex's communication?

Recap

Alex and Koko clearly learned to communicate, but the consensus is that neither showed the syntax of true language, and critics suspect cueing.

๐Ÿ’ก A trick to remember it ยท Words in a beak or signs in a hand are not yet a sentence: the proof of language is in the grammar, not the vocabulary.

Surprising fact ยท Pepperberg herself said Alex used a two-way communications code, not language.

Sources (4)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (14 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Alex (parrot) ยท Wikipedia
  2. [2]Koko (gorilla) ยท Wikipedia
  3. [3]Nim Chimpsky ยท Wikipedia
  4. [4]Animal language ยท Wikipedia
More lessons in ๐Ÿณ Nature (3) See all nature lessons โ†’

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson โ†—