Did the Enlightenment's rights belong to women? What Mary Wollstonecraft answered
The age that proclaimed the rights of man mostly left half of humanity out. In 1792 Mary Wollstonecraft wrote a book to point it out.
Mostly not, which is exactly what Mary Wollstonecraft pointed out. The rights of women and non-white people were generally overlooked in Enlightenment philosophy. In 1792 she published A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, a pioneering work of what is now called feminist philosophy, arguing that women are human beings deserving the same fundamental rights as men.
She was reacting to events. Talleyrand's 1791 report to the in revolutionary France stated that women should receive only a domestic education. At the end of 1791 Olympe de Gouges had also published her Declaration of the Rights of Woman and of the Female Citizen, and women's rights had become central to political debates in France and Britain.
Her central argument was about education. It was often assumed that women were incapable of rational thought. Wollstonecraft answered that women are capable of rationality and only appear otherwise because men have refused to educate them and encouraged them to be frivolous. If natural rights are given by God, she argued, denying them to one part of society is a sin.
There are limits to what can be said about her: it is uncertain whether she believed women should have full voting rights, and the word feminist did not appear until decades after her death. Her book was generally well received at first. Her reputation fell only after her husband's memoir of her life.
The common assumption
- Women were incapable of rational or abstract thought
- Women educated for the pleasure of men (as in Rousseau's Emile)
Wollstonecraft's reply
- Women are capable of rationality
- They appear otherwise because men refused to educate them
- Natural rights cannot be denied to one segment of society
1791
Talleyrand's report; de Gouges's Declaration
1792
A Vindication of the Rights of Woman is published
1798
Godwin's Memoir damages her reputation
1848
, shaped by her work
Quiz me
0/3
Recap
Wollstonecraft argued that women only seem less rational because they are denied education, and that natural rights cannot be withheld from half of humanity.
💡 A trick to remember it · A garden kept in a pot looks stunted: Wollstonecraft says the pot, not the plant, was the problem.
Surprising fact · The book was well received at first; her reputation collapsed only after her husband's memoir revealed her private life.
Connects to
- ⛓️ If the Enlightenment preached liberty, why did the Age of Reason not end slavery?
- 🗳️ What did Rousseau mean by a "general will" that makes you free?
- 📜 Why did John Locke say the mind starts blank and that everyone is born with rights?
- 📜 What did the Declaration of the Rights of Man actually promise, and to whom?
- 🗳️ Did smashing windows win British women the vote?
Sources (3)
No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (15 claims) cites at least one of these.