Do the attachment styles of childhood follow you into adult love?

Two psychologists noticed that lovers act like a baby and its parent. But when researchers tracked babies into adulthood, the link was much weaker than the labels suggest.

Guess first

?

of adults show no significant change in attachment style over time; 20 to 30 percent do
Think of a number, then reveal it.

Partly, but less neatly than the labels suggest. Attachment theory proposes that the way adults approach emotional bonds comes from the bonding they experienced as infants with their caregivers. Adults are sorted into four styles: secure, anxious-preoccupied, dismissive-avoidant and fearful-avoidant. But long studies that follow babies into adulthood find that early security predicts much less than that story implies, and many adults change style along the way.

The idea started with a hunch. Psychologists Cindy Hazan and Phillip Shaver studied adult relationships and noticed that adults interact with each other much as children interact with caregivers. Adults feel comforted when their attachment figures are present and more anxious, or lonely, when they are absent. A partner, it seems, can play the part the caregiver once did.

The four styles describe two things: how you see yourself and how you see others. Secure people tend to have a positive view of both. Anxious-preoccupied people view themselves negatively, feel unsure about trusting others, and seek closeness while fearing they are not wanted. Dismissive-avoidant people tend to see themselves positively and others negatively, and avoid closeness. Fearful-avoidant people see both negatively and want closeness while being scared of it.

Now the evidence. In a Minnesota study that followed children for years, once family background was taken into account, security in infancy accounted for only 5% of the variability in social competence at nineteen. Around 70 to 80 percent of adults show no significant change in style over time, but 20 to 30 percent do, sometimes within weeks or months. So early attachment may shape adult love, but it does not seal it.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.What did Hazan and Shaver notice that led them to apply attachment theory to adult love?
  2. 2.In the Minnesota longitudinal study, how well did infant attachment security predict social competence at nineteen once background variables were taken into account?
  3. 3.What do the adult-stability figures suggest about attachment styles?

Recap

Attachment styles shape adult love but do not seal it: most adults keep their style, yet 20 to 30 percent change, and the link from infancy is weak.

💡 A trick to remember it · An attachment style is a habit of the heart, not a tattoo: it can run for years, and it can still change.

Surprising fact · Once family background was counted, infant attachment security explained only 5% of social competence at nineteen in a Minnesota study.

Sources (2)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (20 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Attachment in adults · Wikipedia
  2. [2]Attachment theory · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🧠 Psychology (3) See all psychology lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗