What is an epigenetic clock, and what does it really measure?

Chemical tags on your DNA can estimate your age with a median error of about 3.6 years, and nobody is sure exactly what they measure.

Guess first

?

median error of Horvath's epigenetic clock across many tissues and cell types

Which one is it?

An epigenetic clock is a method that uses age-related modifications of DNA, which regulate how genes are expressed, as a to estimate biological age. Most are based on : the accumulation of methyl groups at particular sites, called , along DNA. Because these chemical tags change with age in a predictable way, a computer can read thousands of them and output an estimated age.

In 2011 a UCLA team including Steve Horvath showed that methylation in saliva could predict age with an average accuracy of 5.2 years. Horvath's 2013 clock, the first multi-tissue clock, went further: the same 353 sites and the same algorithm work for any DNA source in the body. Its median error is 3.6 years across many tissues, though the error increases for older individuals.

The interesting part is when the clock disagrees with the calendar. Centenarians were found to be 8.6 years younger than expected on the clock, and the offspring of semi-supercentenarians 5.1 years younger than age-matched controls. A blood stem cell transplant from a young donor to an older recipient rejuvenates the epigenetic age of the blood to that of the donor.

What the clock actually measures is still unknown. Blood age predicts all-cause mortality in later life, which has been used to argue that it relates to a process that causes ageing. But a causal site would be removed by the mortality it caused, so the 353 clock sites likely have no causal effect. Treat the clock as a readout of ageing, not as proof of its cause.

Try it

Clock age against calendar age

02550751000255075100Chronological age (years)Age shown by the clock (years)

y = 1x + 0

Challenge · Set the offset to +10. What does the clock read for someone whose chronological age is 50? Then try −10, close to the 8.6 years by which centenarians read younger than expected.

A simple model of the idea of age acceleration, not real data: the clock reads calendar age plus an offset. Real clocks scatter around the line (median error 3.6 years).

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.Why do researchers say the 353 clock sites likely have no causal effect on ageing?
  2. 2.What did centenarians show on the clock?
  3. 3.What kind of intervention can a biological age clock capture?

Recap

The clock reads age; it does not prove what causes ageing.

💡 A trick to remember it · A clock tells the time without making the time pass: epigenetic clocks read ageing, they don't drive it.

Surprising fact · What exactly the clock measures is still not known, and its sites likely have no causal effect on ageing.

Sources (1)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (16 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Epigenetic clock · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🫀 Human body (3) See all human body lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗