What was the Donation of Constantine, and how did Lorenzo Valla expose the forgery?

For centuries, popes cited a decree from the Roman emperor that was a fake, and a priest spotted it by its bad Latin.

The Donation of Constantine was a forged Roman imperial decree by which the emperor Constantine the Great supposedly handed authority over Rome and the western Roman Empire to the pope. It was composed probably in the 8th century, and it was used, especially in the 13th century, to support papal claims of political authority. For most of the Middle Ages almost everyone accepted it as genuine. It was exposed in 1439 and 1440 by Lorenzo Valla, an Italian Catholic priest and Renaissance , with solid arguments.

The document was generous. "Constantine" professes Christianity and gives Pope Sylvester I imperial and privileges, and the Lateran Palace. Rome, the rest of Italy and the western provinces of the empire are made over to the papacy. A story attached to it told how Sylvester rescued the Romans from a local dragon and miraculously cured the emperor's leprosy through baptism. It has been suggested that an early draft was made in the middle of the 8th century to help Pope Stephen II in his negotiations with Pepin the Short. In 1054, Pope Leo IX cited a large portion of it in a letter to the Patriarch of Constantinople, believing it genuine.

The life of a forgery
  1. Mid-700s

    An early draft is thought to have been made

  2. 1054

    Pope Leo IX cites it as genuine

  3. 1439-1440

    Valla exposes it

  4. 1453

    Pius II writes an unpublished tract

  5. 1588-1607

    Baronius admits it is a

Valla attacked the text itself. Its language, he argued, pointed to the 8th century, not the 4th. It used the word "satrap", which he believed Romans such as Constantine would not have used. And the Latin was poor for such an important document, constantly switching tenses from "we have proclaimed" to "we decree". He also noted that the facts made no sense: Constantine could not legally have given the powers claimed, and there was no contemporary evidence of such a huge change.

It was not a safe thing to do. Valla worked at the court of Alfonso V of Aragon, who was in a territorial conflict with the Papal States, and in 1444 he was put on trial before the Catholic . Alfonso protected him from imprisonment.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.What did the Donation of Constantine claim?
  2. 2.How did Lorenzo Valla show the document could not be from the 4th century?
  3. 3.What happened to the Donation after Valla's exposure?

Recap

The document claimed an emperor's gift, but its words and dates belonged to a much later age, and Valla proved it.

💡 A trick to remember it · Wrong words, wrong century: Valla heard the eighth century speaking in a fourth-century emperor's voice.

Surprising fact · A Catholic priest, Lorenzo Valla, exposed it in 1439-1440, and the Church only fully conceded the forgery around 1600.

Sources (2)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (15 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Donation of Constantine · Wikipedia
  2. [2]Lorenzo Valla · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🏛 History (3) See all history lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗