History●●●●●Difficulty 5 of 5

Why did America's first constitution fail, and what compromises built its replacement?

The Articles of Confederation worked as designed, and that was the problem. The 1787 Convention that replaced them was a bargaining session, and slavery was part of the bargain.

β–Ά Start the story

It failed because it was built to be weak, and that weakness left Congress unable to pay its bills or enforce its decisions. The Articles of Confederation consciously established a weak government, with only the powers the colonies had recognised as belonging to the British Crown and Parliament. Congress could not tax: it could only ask the states for money, and the states often failed to pay in full. It lacked enforcement powers, and most decisions, including changes to the Articles, needed all thirteen state legislatures to agree. Its paper money fell so far that people said something was "not worth a continental".

The weakness showed in 1786 and 1787, when Shays's Rebellion, an armed uprising in Massachusetts over debt and taxes, broke out. The federal government could not finance troops to stop it, and Massachusetts militias did. Many already thought the Articles untenable, and scholars still debate how much the rebellion mattered.

The Articles versus the Constitution

Articles of Confederation

  • Congress could only request money
  • No power to enforce its decisions
  • Changes needed all 13 states

The 1787 plan

  • Three branches of government
  • House by population
  • Equal vote for each state in the Senate

In 1787 delegates met in Philadelphia, under George Washington as president. Most did not arrive intending to write a new constitution, but they did. They agreed on three branches of government, and they bargained over how big states and small states would be represented: the House by population, the Senate with an equal vote for each state.

Slavery was also bargained over. Slave states wanted their whole population counted for House seats, and free states wanted enslaved people left out, since they had no vote. The Three-fifths Compromise counted three-fifths of each state's enslaved population, which gave the South more power in the House. It was replaced by the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868.

How the three-fifths clause worked
  1. Step 1: The dispute

    Whether enslaved people count toward House seats

  2. Step 2: The bargain

    Three-fifths of the enslaved population counted

  3. Step 3: The effect

    More House power for the South relative to the North

  4. Step 4: The end

    by the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.Why was Congress under the Articles of Confederation so short of money?
  2. 2.What was surprising about how the 1787 Constitutional Convention began?
  3. 3.What did the Three-fifths Compromise do?

Recap

A government built to be weak could not tax or enforce, so delegates met and bargained their way to a new system.

πŸ’‘ A trick to remember it Β· A weak chain, a strong deal: the Articles let the states hold the purse, and the Convention bargained its way to a bigger government.

Surprising fact Β· Delegates came to improve the Articles and ended up writing an entirely new constitution.

Sources (4)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (16 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Articles of Confederation Β· Wikipedia
  2. [2]Constitutional Convention (United States) Β· Wikipedia
  3. [3]Three-fifths Compromise Β· Wikipedia
  4. [4]Shays's Rebellion Β· Wikipedia
More lessons in πŸ› History (3) See all history lessons β†’

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson β†—