Why did the FDA turn down MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD in 2024?

Two large trials said MDMA-assisted therapy helped people with PTSD, yet an expert panel voted against it 9 to 2 and the FDA said no in August 2024; both sides have a case.

The FDA turned down MDMA-assisted therapy for in August 2024 because it judged that the data submitted did not show enough: it cited insufficient data and concerns about trial methodology, and asked for an additional late-stage trial. Developers and supporters disagreed, arguing that most of the requests could be met with existing data.

The background is a drug with a long, odd history. MDMA was first made in 1912 by a chemist at the company Merck, was used to enhance psychotherapy from the 1970s, and became a street drug in the 1980s. It acts mainly by increasing the release of serotonin, dopamine and . When the US Drug Enforcement Administration proposed controlling it in the 1980s, psychiatrists, psychotherapists and researchers objected and asked for a hearing, which surprised the agency; the judge recommended a lighter category, but the DEA administrator overruled and classified it as Schedule I.

The comeback started in 2017, when the FDA gave MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for . In December 2023 the developer completed phase 3 trials and filed an application. In the two phase 3 studies, remission rates were 67 to 71% with MDMA-assisted therapy versus 32 to 48% with placebo-assisted therapy.

The road to the FDA's answer
  1. 1980s

    DEA overrules its judge and places MDMA in Schedule I

  2. 2017

    FDA grants

  3. Dec 2023

    Phase 3 trials completed; application filed

  4. Jun 2024

    FDA votes 9-2 and 10-1 against

  5. Aug 2024

    FDA declines to approve and asks for another trial

  6. Aug 2026

    Application resubmitted with new data

Then, in June 2024, an 11-member voted 9 to 2 that the data did not show effectiveness and 10 to 1 that benefits did not outweigh risks. The reasons cited included concerns about (people can tell that they took MDMA), side effects such as cardiovascular effects, missing detail on misuse potential, and accusations of professional bias. The FDA followed in August 2024. As of August 2026 the company, now renamed Resilient Pharmaceuticals, had resubmitted its application with new data.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.What was one reason cited for the FDA panel's negative vote?
  2. 2.How did the developer respond to the request for a third trial?
  3. 3.What did the two phase 3 studies report about remission?

Recap

MDMA therapy had strong trial numbers, but regulators cited insufficient data, unblinding and methodological concerns, and the developers disputed that.

💡 A trick to remember it · A big gap between 67 and 32 is harder to trust when everyone can tell which side they are on.

Surprising fact · The developer resubmitted its application in August 2026 with new data.

Sources (3)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (15 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]MDMA · Wikipedia
  2. [2]Lykos Therapeutics · Wikipedia
  3. [3]Psychedelic therapy · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🫀 Human body (3) See all human body lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗