Religions●●●●●Difficulty 5 of 5

Did the flood story in Genesis come from Mesopotamia?

In 1872 a British Museum assistant read a clay tablet from Nineveh and found a flood, a boat and a raven that never came back. Scholars still debate what that means for Genesis.

▶ Start the story

Most scholars who study the texts think so, though in a more careful way than the headline suggests. The Genesis flood narrative, chapters 6 to 9 of the Book of Genesis, tells how God decided to destroy creation and saved only Noah and those who went with him into an ark. Scholars generally believe it was adapted from older Mesopotamian flood traditions, especially the Epic of Gilgamesh.

The reason is the order of the texts. Genesis was probably composed around the 5th century BCE, and the including the flood may have been added as late as the 3rd century BCE. The Mesopotamian flood myth, by contrast, is believed to have originated in the Old Babylonian Period, centuries earlier, and to have reached in the latter half of the 2nd millennium BCE. Three Mesopotamian versions survive: the Sumerian Epic of Ziusudra and episodes in the Atrahasis and Gilgamesh epics. The hero is called Ziusudra, Atrahasis or Utnapishtim, depending on the version.

The stories echo each other in details. In the Gilgamesh account Utnapishtim builds a boat and takes his family, craftsmen and "all the beasts and animals of the field". On the seventh day he releases a dove, which comes back, a swallow, which also comes back, and a raven, which does not. Afterwards he makes a sacrifice. In Genesis, the ark rests on the mountains of Ararat, and Noah builds an altar and makes a sacrifice.

Two flood stories

Gilgamesh, tablet XI

  • Utnapishtim builds a boat
  • Releases a dove, a swallow and a raven
  • Offers a sacrifice

Genesis 6 to 9

  • Noah builds an ark
  • Ark rests on the mountains of Ararat
  • Builds an altar and sacrifices

The discovery was dramatic. In 1872 George Smith, an assistant at the British Museum, translated a tablet from Nineveh. He reportedly exclaimed that he was the first man to read that after more than two thousand years of oblivion. For scholars, comparing the two is a question about how texts travel and change; it does not by itself settle what the story means to the people who hold it sacred.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.Why do many scholars think the Mesopotamian flood story came first?
  2. 2.How strong is the suggested link between the names Noah and Utnapishtim?
  3. 3.What does the flood layer found at Shuruppak show?

Recap

Many scholars think Genesis adapted older Mesopotamian flood traditions, especially Gilgamesh, but what the stories meant to each people is another question.

💡 A trick to remember it · Picture one story handed down a line of tellers, Ziusudra, Atrahasis, Utnapishtim, then Noah: scholars trace the hand-offs, while each teller gave it their own meaning.

Surprising fact · A tablet from Nineveh read in 1872 revealed a flood story from a tradition older than Genesis.

Sources (3)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (16 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Gilgamesh flood myth · Wikipedia
  2. [2]Genesis flood narrative · Wikipedia
  3. [3]Flood myth · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🕊️ Religions (3) See all religions lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗